ONLINE
Available 24/7
To claim CLE credit, view by: June 20, 2026
Depending on the jurisdiction in which you practice, you may or may not be able to claim credit for viewing this on demand seminar. Please check with your licensing agency for accreditation information.
Originally presented: June 21, 2024 | Course length: 1.0 hour
In the case of Sheetz v. El Dorado County, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies to both legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions. The Court maintains that when the government imposes conditions on obtaining a building permit, those conditions must have an "essential nexus” to the government's land-use interests, and they must have a “rough proportionality” to the development’s impact on the land-use interest. The Court rejects the notion that legislative bodies are exempt from these criteria when imposing permit conditions. Join Tami Diehm and Kiralyn Locke for further analysis of what this ruling means to local governments, developers, and property owners in Minnesota.
– Tammera R. Diehm; Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.
– Kiralyn J. Locke; Bassford Remele
$65
Other discounts that may apply:
Scholarships available!
Need-based scholarships are available for in-person and online seminars. For further information or to obtain a scholarship application, contact us at 800-759-8840 or customerservice@minncle.org.
Minnesota CLE has applied to the Minnesota State Board of CLE for 1.0 standard CLE credit. The maximum number of total credits you may claim for attending this program is 1.0 credit.
Depending on the jurisdiction in which you practice, you may or may not be able to claim credit for viewing this on demand seminar. Please check with your licensing agency for accreditation information.
