ONLINE
Available 24/7
To claim CLE credit, view by: March 19, 2027
Depending on the jurisdiction in which you practice, you may or may not be able to claim credit for viewing this on demand seminar. Please check with your licensing agency for accreditation information.
Originally presented: March 20, 2025 | Course length: 1.0 hour
The recent Supreme Court decision in TikTok v. Garland outlines the application of First Amendment scrutiny analysis to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act as applied to TikTok. However, the holding is narrowly focused, and the First Amendment analysis is incomplete in that the Court assumed without deciding the preliminary issue of whether the contested provisions are subject to First Amendment scrutiny. Despite these limitations, the opinion is an important look into how the Court views issues of national security, freedom of expression, data collection and privacy, and government regulation of social media and other platforms. Join Mahesha Subbaraman for an insightful look at what this case actually teaches us and, despite the explicitly stated narrow focus, the potential implications.
– Mahesha P. Subbaraman; Subbaraman PLLC
$65
Other discounts that may apply:
Scholarships available!
Need-based scholarships are available for in-person and online seminars. For further information or to obtain a scholarship application, contact us at 800-759-8840 or customerservice@minncle.org.
Minnesota CLE has applied to the Minnesota State Board of CLE for 1.0 standard CLE credit. The maximum number of total credits you may claim for attending this program is 1.0 credit.
Depending on the jurisdiction in which you practice, you may or may not be able to claim credit for viewing this on demand seminar. Please check with your licensing agency for accreditation information.
